Beyond doing the same work faster
Productivity matters. But there is a difference between doing an existing task more efficiently and becoming capable of work that was previously out of reach. That second possibility is what I mean by expanding human productive capacity.
AI may lower the cost of accessing expertise, developing skills, creating solutions, and coordinating with others. Those changes could give individuals and small teams options once reserved for much larger organizations. The outcome is not guaranteed.
Why I ask this question
I remember Nigeria when making an ordinary telephone call could be difficult. Returning years later, I saw how mobile connectivity and the internet had changed everyday possibilities. That experience shaped my questions about what happens when powerful technologies become accessible to more people.
It is a personal observation, not proof that AI will follow the same path. The question matters in Lagos, Rio de Janeiro, Atlanta, and beyond. Different places offer different opportunities and face different constraints.
What would count as progress?
I want to look beyond impressive demonstrations and adoption numbers. Can people reliably do something valuable that they could not do before? Do they earn more, serve customers better, learn more effectively, or coordinate work at lower cost? Who receives those benefits?
The limits deserve just as much attention: errors, cost, data access, skills, electricity, market demand, institutions, privacy, concentration of power, and displacement. A tool does not create economic value just because it is technically capable.
This site is where I explore those questions as an engineer, builder, and curious observer. I will share arguments, examples, experiments, and the evidence that might change my mind.
Explore the writing →